![]() I really hope my test results were wrong and it actually pretty fast and solid, so that I could use it again. Please compare it with other popular imaging software in terms of speed and compression. It appears Symantec did not catch up with the young, modern competitors and lacks a lot in speed and compression.Īnyone interested in testing out the latest 12. It brings back so much memory when I did disk imaging back in teh XP days, when I used a boot CD to run the DOS version of Symantec Ghost v8.2. Managing today s increasingly heterogeneous. To me, Symantec Ghost Enterprise version has so much memory and it gives me nostalgia because it still has the same GUI. New Zealand (NZ) product reviews by mums & dads like you - Symantec Ghost Solution Suite v1.1 (Symantec). The same task only took Drive Snapshot 3.3min to complete with a much smaller image (~25GB in size). Availablememory,diskspace,andNICinformation Operatingsystem Versionandpatchlevel Networktopology Router,gateway,andIPaddressinformation Problemdescription. If choose either "low" or "high" compression, Ghost would take 15-25 min to finish. Good mid-range specs for testing a security suite intended for a minimum specification of Windows XP SP3, 1.6 GHz CPU, 1GB RAM and 1 gigabyte of free space. With "No compression" Ghost would take >10min to finish on my I7-2700K with 8GB RAM desktop.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |